{"id":2450,"date":"2019-12-05T23:21:26","date_gmt":"2019-12-05T22:21:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fodina.de\/?page_id=2450"},"modified":"2019-12-21T02:59:11","modified_gmt":"2019-12-21T01:59:11","slug":"harmonyli-ly","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/2022.fodina.de\/en\/harmonyli-ly\/","title":{"rendered":"harmonyli.ly en"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n

Latest<\/h4>\n

2019-12-07: <\/strong> stable release 1.0 published – together with examples and a documentating tutorial.\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n

\n
\n

Motto<\/h4>\n

Complexity is like water: trying to compress it, only increases the pressure.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n

\n

harmonyli.ly<\/h2>\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n

harmony<\/span>li.ly <\/span> is a LilyPond library for embedding harmony analysis symbols into a score. It can deal with symbols of the scale-step-theory<\/em> as well as symbols of the funktional harmony theory<\/em>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n

In the beginning, I simply wanted to find the best way to use analyzed music examples in musicological files. On the one side, the bundle of LaTeX<\/em>, MusicTeX<\/em> und Harmony<\/em> offers such an opportunity – in general. But practically, MusicTeX<\/em> is too complicated. It decreases the productivity. On the other side, LaTeX<\/em> and LilyPond<\/em> can be used easily. But they alone do not fulfill the needs of the musicology. \n<\/p>\n

\"Tristan<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n

\nFor closing this gap, I decided to develop harmony<\/span>li.ly <\/span>: As a plugin for LilyPond files, it should be able to do, what harmony<\/em> does for MusicTeX and LaTeX. But for writing the scores, one should be able to use the well known and simple LilyPond language.<\/p>

Here you see an example of what the result can realize.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n

Download and Usage<\/h3>\n